Credit: Image courtesy of Johns Hopkins University
Surveying 850 people who either work in government or
directly with it, researchers found that the inside-the-Beltway
crowd has very little in common with America at large.
I find the results of this survey fascinating, and hope you do to. In simplest terms, the "insiders" that work in Washington D.C., do not match the overall demographics of the country as a whole.
In one way, this isn't surprising. In another, it explains the divided we see between many of our fellow citizens and the professionals who staff our government, i.e. federal bureaucrats.
Okay, so how does this impact us as writers? Obviously, anything that effects our society is grist for the mill. The political divides in our country cause angry, rancorous name-calling and blame-gaming, with very few people from one side willing to even speak to those on the other. This divide has given the least productive congress in the history of the country. It effects the news we read or watch. It even causes angry breaks within families. All of this impacts the story lines and plots we devise.
As a small-government liberal, I find the whole thing disgusting.
According to this study, it turns out that at least one part of what some are saying is true. The people who run our government day-to-day are not fully representative of the country as a whole.
To my mind, this is dangerous, akin to the divide between the governed and the governing elite prior to the French Revolution.
Here's the story:
Johns Hopkins University political scientists wanted to know if America's un-elected officials have enough in common with the people they govern to understand them.
The answer: Not really.
Surveying 850 people who either work in the federal government or directly with it, researchers found that the inside-the-Beltway crowd has very little in common with America at large.
- Washington insiders are more likely to be white.
- They are more educated.
- Their salaries are higher, they vote more often and they have more faith in the fairness of elections.
- They are probably Democrat and liberal.
- They more diligently follow the news.
- And they think the mechanics of government couldn't be easier to comprehend.
click on image
The researchers, Jennifer Bachner and Benjamin Ginsberg, asked hundreds of questions in 2013 of those who work in federal agencies, on Capitol Hill and in other Washington policy jobs. They presented some of their findings recently at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association in a talk called The Civic Distance Between the Rulers and Ruled. Complete results of their research will be featured in their forthcoming book What the Government Thinks of the People.
Americans and federal workers couldn't be more different, they found:
- Ninety-one percent of those who work for federal agencies are white, versus 78 percent of the public.
- In 2012, federal worker compensation averaged $81,704, or 48 percent more than the private sector average of $54,995, according to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. That puts federal workers in the top 10 percent of American earners.
- Sixty percent of those who work on the Hill are Democrats versus 35 percent of Americans at large.
- In the 2012 presidential election, 97 percent of congressional and White House staffers voted versus 80 percent of other Americans. Sixty-two percent of those Hill staffers believe election votes are counted fairly "very often" compared with 33 percent of other Americans.
- Washingtonians read the news at least five days a week compared with about three days a week for the rest of the country.
- And while 100 percent of congressional and White House staffers believe government and politics can be understood by people like them, only 30 percent of regular Americans feel that way.
Is Washington another planet?
All told, Bachner and Ginsberg found, if random Americans were dropped into the offices of a Washington administrative agency or into a lunch at a Washington power restaurant, it would feel and sound to them like another planet. These crucial differences, the researchers say, lead to entirely divergent philosophies on policies, priorities and government's ultimate purpose.
"Official Washington views the public through jaundiced eyes, believing that ordinary Americans are uninformed and misguided and that policymakers should ignore them," Ginsberg says. "The government's lack of trust in the people reflects the civic distance between the American people and their government as much as any political reality. Nevertheless, what the government thinks of the people affects how it governs, especially the chance that policy will be influenced by citizen preferences."
"Some say American democracy would be strengthened if the people received better civic education," Ginsberg continues. "We argue that it is America's governing elite that needs civic education, focusing on the responsibilities of officials in a democracy."
* * * * *Story Source: Materials provided by Johns Hopkins University. "When rulers can't understand the ruled: Study finds significant gaps between Washington insiders, general Americans." ScienceDaily, 15 September 2014.