Election day: The saddest day of the year?

gizmodo.com



The first thing that occurred to me upon reading this report is that this may have something to do with why so many people fail to vote.  Could it be that your candidate or cause losing de-motivates voters?  According to this research, supporters on the losing side of an election are as disheartened by the loss as a losing candidate.

 It's seems apparent that Mitt Romney took his loss in the last presidential election hard.  And his supporters?  Will his loss cause any of his supporters to drop out of the political process altogether?

 For a writer, understanding how people react in the events in their lives helps an author or screenwriter develop meaningful and realistic characters.  Knowing how people cope or don't cope with a loss in an issue they are passionate about helps with this process.

 Here's the report:

Losing Hurts: Partisan Happiness 
in the 2012 Presidential Election

Election Day is difficult for many political candidates. But it's no picnic for their supporters either.

A new study co-authored by a researcher at Washington University in St. Louis shows just how tough election days can be.

The study, co-authored by Lamar Pierce, PhD, associate professor of organization and strategy at Olin Business School, finds that winning elections barely improves the happiness of those from the winning political party, and that losing reduces self-reported happiness and increases sadness substantially.

The study, "Losing Hurts: Partisan Happiness in the 2012 Presidential Election," was published in the Harvard Kennedy School research working paper series and co-authored by Todd Rogers, PhD, from the Harvard Kennedy School; and Jason Snyder, PhD, of the University of California, Los Angeles Anderson School of Management.

The researchers used thousands of daily online survey responses from CivicScience, a market research and data intelligence company, to compare the happiness and sadness reported by those who identify with political parties in the days surrounding the 2012 presidential election.

The sadness effect lasted for about a week, but eventually partisan losers recovered.

"One of our main findings is that the pain of losing the 2012 presidential election dominated the joy of winning it," Pierce said.

Four Stars on Goodreads
The asymmetry the researchers observed between winning and losing is in line with past research on happiness -- bad things tend to hurt more and last longer than comparable good things.

To benchmark exactly how intense the pain of election losses can be, the researchers employed the same methodology used on the election data to study the effects of two national tragedies -- the 2012 school shooting in Newtown, Conn., and the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing -- on Americans' emotions.

Despite the highly traumatic nature of the two events, the results indicated that the sadness increase and happiness decrease that followed reflected only half the effect of an election loss on partisans, with two notable exceptions -- respondents who had children, who were distinctly less happy and more sad after the Newtown shooting; and Boston residents, who responded similarly after the marathon bombing.

Prior research has shown that partisan identity shapes social, mental, economic and physical life. This new research shows that it can have intense effects on identity and well-being.

"We find that partisan identity is even more central to the self than past research might have suggested," the researchers write. "In addition to affecting thinking, preferences, and behavior, it also has sizable hedonic consequences, especially when people experience partisan losses."

The study's abstract can be found at:  Election day: The saddest day of the year?

Related stories:
*  *  *  *  *
Story Source:  Materials provided by Washington University in St. Louis, original article written by Neil Schoenherr.  "Election day: The saddest day of the year?." ScienceDaily, 3 November 2014.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Young Women Objectify Themselves

Image
A recent post in SNfW received some heated reader criticism for publishing "bad science" with what some felt were conclusions that perpetuated a sexist viewpoint. Stereotypes, like clichés, are useful in our day to day lives.  We simply do not have the time or mental resources to get to know every person we meet or see and to make value judgments based on that individual's personality.  In the movies, television or the theater, the writer doesn't have the time to flesh out every character in a story, so we all use stereotypes to help the reader or viewer understand what a character is about and the role they play. We share stereotypes about good guys, bad guys, gang members, clowns, politicians, welfare recipients, bureaucrats, and on and on.  It helps us organize and understand the world around us.  We see a white hat on the screen, it's a good guy.  We see a black hat, it's a bad guy. For a writer, stereotypes save a lot of ba...
Read more

FACTOIDS: Gay-dar revisited; Casinos Cure Obesity in Children; Plus, Preschoolers can do Algebra and more

Are you smarter than a 5-year-old?  Preschoolers can do algebra M illions of high school and college algebra students are united in a shared agony over solving for x and y, and for those to whom the answers don't come easily, it gets worse: Most preschoolers and kindergarteners can do some algebra before even entering a math class. A new study finds that most preschoolers and kindergarteners, or children between 4 and 6, can do basic algebra naturally. Naturally, they can.  Which is why we wait until they can't to teach it . 'Gaydar' revisited:  New insight into how women perceive  emotions, thoughts, personality, and sexual orientation A recent study out of Northeastern University sheds new light on the phenomenon known as "gaydar," or the ability to determine another person's sexual orientation. The study found that women who identified as lesbians were better at detecting sexual orientation in other women, but that straight women wer...
Read more

How the brain listens to literature

Image
Whole-brain analysis results for the action localizer scan in yellow (hand action execution versus rest), and for the mentalizing localizer in blue (false belief stories versus false photograph stories). The action localizer activated the cortical motor system robustly, and the mentalizing localizer led to activations in the previously defined mentalizing network. How the brain listens to literature When we listen to stories, we immerse ourselves into the situations described and empathize with the feelings of the characters. Only recently has it become possible to find out how exactly this process works in the brain. Roel Willems and Annabel Nijhof have now succeeded using an fMRI* scanner to measure how people listen to a literary story.  Everybody immerses themselves in stories in their own way. However, due to technological limitations, how we comprehend literature has only previously been studied at a group level without looking at individual differences. Wille...
Read more

Remember faces but not names? You got it wrong.

Image
Source:   Daily Excelsior So, you think you're good at remembering faces, but terrible with names? New research has revealed we are actually better at remembering names than faces The cringe-worthy experience of not being able to remember an acquaintance's name leads many of us to believe we are terrible with names. However, new research has revealed this intuition is misleading; we are actually better at remembering names than faces. With the Christmas party season fast approaching, there will be plenty of opportunity to re-live the familiar, and excruciatingly-awkward, social situation of not being able to remember an acquaintance's name. This cringe-worthy experience leads many of us to believe we are terrible at remembering names. However, new research has revealed this intuition is misleading; we are actually better at remembering names than faces. The authors of the study, from the University of York, suggest that when we castigate ourselves f...
Read more