World War I: Fusion of man and machine

sheldonhorses.wordpress.com
World War I changed how armies fight.  Going in, it was men on horses.  Coming out, it was men in tanks.  Going in, it was massed waves of men, often on horseback, charging fortified positions, coming out it was men following tanks that overwhelmed fortified positions.  

 In August 1914, the few aircraft in the skies were spotters and reconnaissance, coming out, large bombers were attacking positions in the rear as well as London.

 Out of this came both the technologies and the strategies and tactics that established the way armies fought in World War II and the way our armies fight today.

 Here's the report, with a link to the original article in the attribution.
*  *  *  *  *

The First World War: Fusion of man and machine

The First World War is widely regarded as having sparked technological innovations. The relationship man -- machine changed drastically. Two PhD students from the Mercator Research Group "Spaces of Anthropological Knowledge" have researched in what way those changes were reflected in literature. RUBIN, the Ruhr-Universität's science magazine, published a report about their research.
The Fighting Tanks Since 1916
(Tank Combat History
During World War 1
 and Subsequent Designs)

by Ralph E. Jones

Order new or used from
Powell's Books

The PhD students Kevin Liggieri and Felix Hüttemann wished to find out how the relationship between man and machine changed during the First World War and if that was the period in which today's attitude towards machines was born. While media scholar Felix Hüttemann focused mainly on documents authored by the officer and writer Ernst Jünger, philosopher Kevin Liggieri took a closer look at the depiction of military aviation.

Ernst Jünger as pioneer of his era
The First World War was the first war that was industrially led. Horse and bayonet were replaced by tanks and rapid-fire guns. "The perspective shifted from the machine as a mere instrument to its role as the decisive factor," says Hüttemann. This is how Ernst Jünger phrased it in his essay "The Machine": "We had meant to make them work for us as iron warriors, but we got caught in their wheels instead." This notion was later picked up by the German philosopher and logician Gotthard Günther. His technology and philosophy-focused ideas had made Ernst Jünger a pioneer of his era, as Felix Hüttemann concluded following his research into post-war literature.
Aircraft of World War 1:
1914 1918

by Jack Herris

Order new or used from
Powell's Books

The aviator novel as modern-day adventure
In the First World War, the lines between man and machine became blurry in war aviation, too, whose depiction in literature Kevin Liggieri studied in-depth. In addition to books about that era, he also consulted historical documents such as pilots' records, field reports and diary entries for research purposes. "My starting point was the question if the symmetry man -- machine did indeed exist or if it was merely represented in literature," says Liggieri. His thesis: "I think literature has a classifying function. It wants to engage with new things, which we don't quite understand yet. To this end, it points out analogies and images, which are meant to help us understand." As far as the depiction of war aviation was concerned, this meant that aviator novels often followed the same structure as adventure novels. With the pilot cast in the part of the hero, who tames the "wild" machine and eventually fuses with her for form one entity in order to defeat the enemy.

Related stories:


Story Source:  Materials provided by Ruhr-Universitaet-Bochum, original written by Raffaela Römer.  "The First World War: Fusion of man and machine." ScienceDaily, 25 September 2015

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Workout supplements: An emerging eating disorder in men?

Image
therewontbeanydoves.wordpress.com When developing a fictional character, you may not think about the character using large amounts of over-the-counter dietary supplements.  Especially a man who uses large amounts of workout supplements. While there has been widespread publicity on the dangers of the non-prescribed use of anabolic steroids, not much is said about legal, over-the-counter supplements.  Are there risks?  And if so, what are they?  There are several things the writer should consider. Supplement use is becoming an eating disorder with many men who use them to prepare for and recover from a workout. There is growing evidence of a link between muscle-building supplements and testicular cancer. There is evidence that over-the counter medications and supplements are the most common causes of drug-induced liver failure (a rare event, but still a risk.)  There is even evidence that, “certain popular herbal and dietary supplements can also cause liver damage,"
Read more

Remember faces but not names? You got it wrong.

Image
Source:   Daily Excelsior So, you think you're good at remembering faces, but terrible with names? New research has revealed we are actually better at remembering names than faces The cringe-worthy experience of not being able to remember an acquaintance's name leads many of us to believe we are terrible with names. However, new research has revealed this intuition is misleading; we are actually better at remembering names than faces. With the Christmas party season fast approaching, there will be plenty of opportunity to re-live the familiar, and excruciatingly-awkward, social situation of not being able to remember an acquaintance's name. This cringe-worthy experience leads many of us to believe we are terrible at remembering names. However, new research has revealed this intuition is misleading; we are actually better at remembering names than faces. The authors of the study, from the University of York, suggest that when we castigate ourselves f
Read more

Using Artificial Intelligence to Predict Violence. . . or to Control It?

Image
Dell EMC InFocus A staple of science fiction is a future where artificial intelligence (AI) is used to control people's behavior, or, in which AI supplants the human element. I have mixed feelings about AI, its uses, and our future.  For one thing, it's questionable that the human brain can increase in size or complexity without causing the system to slow down.  The brain of a "genius" isn't larger than yours or mine, its simply organized differently.  The difference between early versions of humans and modern humans is in large part, size.  Yes, brain organization plays a role, but until the latest iteration of us, brain size was the critical factor. If we as a species have survived based on brain size, and brain size has maxed out, how do we continue to evolve intellectually?  Better organization?  Yes, but can we ever hope to create and control this type of evolutionary activity? One solution to maxed human brain size is creating an interface
Read more

M.I.T. Research Explains How Will Rogers Observation Works

Image
Finally it appears that MIT has gotten involved in proving Will's syllogism, "There are three kinds of men. The one that learns by reading. The few who learn by observation. The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence for themselves." Read his statement carefully.   ONE learns by reading.   A FEW who learn by observation. Then there's the rest of us. The reason for this, it turns out, is a special circuit in the brain that you or I need to have a functioning version of to actually learn by observing others.  Based on how we all behave, it is a circuit most of us must be missing.   Or perhaps it shorted out the first time we peed on an electric fence and it has yet to grow back.   *  *  *  *  * Brain circuit helps us learn by watching others Scientists pinpoint neural interactions that are necessary for observational learning Researchers have identified a brain circuit required to learn by watching others. This circuit,
Read more

War Leaves 17 Women for Every Man

Image
Source: Psychology Today This report of a "Y-chromosone Bottleneck" that occurred seven thousand years ago raises some interesting questions. In it, the author theorizes that war may have the effect of simplifying the male genome to the point that it's like having but one man for every 17 women.  Sounds like a male fantasy, but is it good for humanity and the potential for our survival on our planet? Research shows that healthy populations depend on genetic diversity such as in this report from 2015,  Genetic Diversity Linked to Today's Taller, Smarter People .  So if war has the effect of creating a male genome bottleneck, does the bottleneck limit the diversity needed to maintain a healthy population?  Could genetic bottlenecks be the reason that some militarily aggressive cultures such as the ancient Romans and Greeks are very peaceful today?  i.e., have they had the aggression breed out of them by years of wars in which the most warlike men died in bat
Read more