Are social media making us less able to read emotions?

Credit: Stephen Nowicki

Students in the study looked at photos and were tested on
their ability to recognize the emotions of those pictured.

Much research has been published in the past year about the effect of video games and social media on children and adults.  Some of our worst fears, especially that violent video games make people more violent, have been calmed, but there still is an effect. 

This research documents a new concern, that using social media lessens out ability to read emotions and relate to others.  According to this research, we should be concerned as social media does have an impact on people based on the results of a study of a group of sixth grade students.

Here's the report.

In our digital world, are young people losing the ability to read emotions?

Are young people losing the ability to read emotions in our digital world?

Scientists report that sixth-graders who went five days without even glancing at a smartphone, television or other screen did substantially better at reading emotions than sixth-graders from the same school who, as usual, spent hours each day looking at their smartphones and other screens.

Suggested reading
click on image
Children's social skills may be declining as they have less time for face-to-face interaction due to their increased use of digital media, according to a UCLA psychology study.

UCLA scientists found that sixth-graders who went five days without even glancing at a smartphone, television or other digital screen did substantially better at reading human emotions than sixth-graders from the same school who continued to spend hours each day looking at their electronic devices.

"Many people are looking at the benefits of digital media in education, and not many are looking at the costs," said Patricia Greenfield, a distinguished professor of psychology in the UCLA College and senior author of the study. "Decreased sensitivity to emotional cues -- losing the ability to understand the emotions of other people -- is one of the costs. The displacement of in-person social interaction by screen interaction seems to be reducing social skills."

The psychologists studied two sets of sixth-graders from a Southern California public school: 51 who lived together for five days at the Pali Institute, a nature and science camp about 70 miles east of Los Angeles, and 54 others from the same school. (The group of 54 would attend the camp later, after the study was conducted.)

The camp doesn't allow students to use electronic devices -- a policy that many students found to be challenging for the first couple of days. Most adapted quickly, however, according to camp counselors.
At the beginning and end of the study, both groups of students were evaluated for their ability to recognize other people's emotions in photos and videos. The students were shown 48 pictures of faces that were happy, sad, angry or scared, and asked to identify their feelings.

They also watched videos of actors interacting with one another and were instructed to describe the characters' emotions. In one scene, students take a test and submit it to their teacher; one of the students is confident and excited, the other is anxious. In another scene, one student is saddened after being excluded from a conversation.

The children who had been at the camp improved significantly over the five days in their ability to read facial emotions and other nonverbal cues to emotion, compared with the students who continued to use their media devices.

Researchers tracked how many errors the students made when attempting to identify the emotions in the photos and videos. When analyzing the photos, for example, those at the camp made an average of 9.41 errors at the end of the study, down from 14.02 at the beginning. The students who didn't attend the camp recorded a significantly smaller change. For the videos, the students who went to camp improved significantly, while the scores of the students who did not attend camp showed no change. The findings applied equally to both boys and girls.

You can't learn nonverbal emotional cues from a screen in the way you can learn it from face-to-face communication," said lead author Yalda Uhls, a senior researcher with the UCLA's Children's Digital Media Center, Los Angeles. "If you're not practicing face-to-face communication, you could be losing important social skills."

Students participating in the study reported that they text, watch television and play video games for an average of four-and-a-half hours on a typical school day. Some surveys have found that the figure is even higher nationally, said Uhls, who also is the Southern California regional director of Common Sense Media, a national nonprofit organization.

Greenfield, director of the CDMC, considers the results significant, given that they occurred after only five days.

She said the implications of the research are that people need more face-to-face interaction, and that even when people use digital media for social interaction, they're spending less time developing social skills and learning to read nonverbal cues.

"We've shown a model of what more face-to-face interaction can do," Greenfield said. "Social interaction is needed to develop skills in understanding the emotions of other people."

Uhls said that emoticons are a poor substitute for face-to-face communication: "We are social creatures. We need device-free time."
*  *  *  *  *

Story Source: Materials provided by University of California - Los Angeles, article written by Stuart Wolpert. Yalda T. Uhls, Minas Michikyan, Jordan Morris, Debra Garcia, Gary W. Small, Eleni Zgourou, Patricia M. Greenfield. Five days at outdoor education camp without screens improves preteen skills with nonverbal emotion cues. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014


  1. It seems to me that the only thing researchers proved was that a person's ability to judge emotions can be improved by avoiding media devices for a short time---5 days in the study.

    When an experiment is conducted to prove a point, the point can generally be proved by manipulating the data.

  2. True, data can be manipulated. What you need understand is that to be published in a reputable scientific journal, research papers are peer reviewed to ensure that the data are not manipulated, and that a competent deductive technique was used. For every study published, many more are rejected for data manipulation or returned for further work. In reality, the manipulation of scientific data is the realm of the non-scientist who uses inductive reasoning to prove a point, looking for evidence that supports their forgone conclusion. Your comment refers to this non-scientific manipulation often practiced by politicians, preachers and certain journalists.

    As far as the five day "recovery period", your comment is spot on. In other words, all it takes to improve the skill of reading emotion in another is practice, and makes the point that living in a social media world prevents getting this practice.

    Thanks for the comments.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Coffee helps teams work together

Einstein's "Spooky Action at a Distance" Proven

Many Hurricane Harvey Deaths in Houston Occurred Outside a Flood Zone

The Faults in the Movie, San Andreas

Science shows why we can't tell Clark Kent is Superman