Parallel Universes Exist. . . and Interact

Credit: © Giuseppe Porzani / Fotolia

Artist's abstraction (stock illustration). According to Poirier's theory,
quantum reality is not wave-like at all, but is composed of multiple,
classical-like worlds. In each of these worlds, every object has 
very definite physical attributes, such as position and momentum.
Within a given world, objects interact with each other classically.
All quantum effects, on the other hand, manifest as interactions
between "nearby" parallel worlds.

Sorry, authors and screenwriters, researchers are taking interacting parallel worlds and universes out of the realm of science fiction and into that of hard science.   Very hard science.

Griffith University academics, Professor Howard Wiseman and Dr Michael Hall from Griffith's Centre for Quantum Dynamics, and Dr Dirk-Andre Deckert from the University of California, are challenging the foundations of quantum science with a radical new theory based on the existence of, and interactions between, parallel universes.

"It is my supposition that
the Universe is not only
queerer than we imagine,
it is queerer than we can
imagine."

John B.S. Haldane
The team proposes that parallel universes exist and interact. That is, rather than evolving independently, nearby worlds influence one another by a subtle force of repulsion. They show that such an interaction could explain everything that is bizarre about quantum mechanics.

Also released in the past few days is an announcement from Texas Tech University that a chemical physicist, Bill Poirer, that restates his 2010 publication of a new theory of quantum mechanics that presumes not only that parallel worlds exist, but also that their mutual interaction is what gives rise to all quantum effects observed in nature.

The idea of many worlds is not new. In 1957, Hugh Everett III published what is now called the "Many Worlds" interpretation of quantum mechanics. "But in Everett's theory, the worlds are not well defined," according to Poirier, "because the underlying mathematics is that of the standard wave-based quantum theory." In contrast, in Poirier's "Many Interacting Worlds" theory, the worlds are built into the mathematics right from the start.

*  *  *  *  *
Let's rest here for a moment. If I need a break, you must as well.

Understand: I am not able to explain quantum mechanics or particle physics or whatever they choose to call it, let alone this new theory.  I flunked numbers in college.

To put it another way, I haven't a clue what the hell these guys are talking about. I understand that the universe is queerer than I understand or can understand. Thank you, Professor Haldane, we're with you so far.

Four dimensions, that I can work with, except the idea that time and space are actually the same thing unnerves me.

I've also read that physicists and mathematicians posit that String Theory, one of several competing "Theories of Everything," predicts eleven dimensions. Or twenty-seven dimensions. Poirer explains below that there are an infinite number of parallel worlds.
Andrew Sachs as the perpetually
bewildered Manuel on Fawlty Towers.
Mr. Sachs' desperate cry of ¿qué?
certainly conveys most people's
reaction on this entire subject.

To quote that noted thinker, Sesame Street's Hairy Monster, "Brain hurt." Or more accurately, I am as confused trying to understand this as the character, Manuel, was listening to Basil Fawlty on Fawlty Towers. I now understand the depth of feeling of Manuel when he said, "¿Qué?"

It is reassuring that eminent American theoretical physicist and physics explainer-in-everyday-terms, Richard Feynman, once said, "I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics." I assume he includes himself, not just you and I. I wouldn't be surprised that one sub-theorem of Quantum Mechanics is that if you think you know what's going on, you're fooling yourself.
*  *  *  *  *

Quantum theory is needed to explain how the universe works at the microscopic scale, and is believed to apply to all matter. But it is notoriously difficult to fathom, exhibiting weird phenomena which seem to violate the laws of cause and effect. However, the "Many-Interacting Worlds" approach developed at Griffith University provides a new and daring perspective on this baffling field.

"In Everett's Many-Worlds Interpretation, each universe branches into a bunch of new universes every time a quantum measurement is made. All possibilities are therefore realized -- in some universes the dinosaur-killing asteroid missed Earth. In others, Australia was colonized by the Portuguese. (I would love to visit the universe where Hitler is a men's room attendant so I can pee on his shoes.)

"But critics question the reality of these other universes, since they do not influence our universe at all. On this score, our Many Interacting Worlds approach is completely different, as its name implies."

Professor Wiseman and his colleagues propose that: The universe we experience is just one of a gigantic number of worlds. Some are almost identical to ours while most are very different;
  • All of these worlds are equally real, exist continuously through time, and possess precisely defined properties;
  • All quantum phenomena arise from a universal force of repulsion between 'nearby' (i.e. similar) worlds which tends to make them more dissimilar.
"I think I can safely say
that nobody understands
quantum mechanics."
~ Richard Feynman
Dr. Hall says the "Many-Interacting Worlds" theory may even create the possibility of testing for the existence of other worlds. (Might we not meet our inter-dimensional doppelganger once there? Only to learn he or she was assigned the beauty and fortune universe while we're stuck here, defeated at every turn. As noted philosopher Woody Allen once observed in a lecture on reality, "This is still the best place to get a hamburger.")

"The beauty of our approach is that if there is just one world our theory reduces to Newtonian mechanics, while if there is a gigantic number of worlds it reproduces quantum mechanics," he says.  "In between it predicts something new that is neither Newton's theory nor quantum theory. We also believe that, in providing a new mental picture of quantum effects, it will be useful in planning experiments to test and exploit quantum phenomena."

Suggested Reading
The Quantum Universe:
(And Why Anything That
Can Happen, Does)
According to Poirier's theory, quantum reality is not wave-like at all, but is composed of multiple, classical-like worlds. In each of these worlds, every object has very definite physical attributes, such as position and momentum. Within a given world, objects interact with each other classically. All quantum effects, on the other hand, manifest as interactions between "nearby" parallel worlds.

Does this prove anything definitive about the nature of reality? (Other than how easy it is to confuse people?)

"Not yet," says Poirier. "Experimental observations are the ultimate test of any theory. So far, Many Interacting Worlds makes the same predictions as standard quantum theory, so all we can say for sure at present is that it might be correct."

Related stories:
*  *  *  *  *
Reference:
  1. Michael J. W. Hall, Dirk-André Deckert, Howard M. Wiseman. Quantum Phenomena Modeled by Interactions between Many Classical Worlds. Physical Review X, 2014.
  2. Jeremy Schiff, Bill Poirier. Communication: Quantum mechanics without wavefunctions. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2012.
  3. Bill Poirier. Bohmian mechanics without pilot waves. Chemical Physics, 2010.

Comments

  1. tonyonMarch 5, 2015 at 1:03 PM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. tonyonMarch 5, 2015 at 1:04 PM

    parallel universes are necessary to immortality

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jim FisherApril 5, 2015 at 5:09 PM

    I wouldn't be surprised. I asked a theoretical physicist about this possibility, and he responded, in essence, "beats me." Of course, his answer was two pages long and filled with twenty-five cent words.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An unexpected way to recover from a breakup

Image
Breaking up is truly hard to do. And recovery from a breakup can be even harder. Your friends may counsel you to put the whole thing out of your mind. But new research suggests that repeatedly reflecting on a break-up -- even through participation in a research study -- actually speeds emotional recovery. "Breakups are ubiquitous -- most adults have experienced at least one in their life -- and are typically very distressing," says Grace Larson of Northwestern University. After studying divorce and breakups for years using longitudinal, multi-method designs, Larson and her then-adviser David Sbarra of the University of Arizona wanted to study whether these research techniques on their own were affecting participants. One concern they had was that the studies could be harming participants, Larson says. "At first glance, it might seem like repeatedly reminding participants that they had just broken up -- and asking them to describe the breakup over and over --
Read more

Greek Bronze Age ended 100 years earlier than thought

Image
Source: www.shef.ac.uk The charred remains of Assiros Toumba in Greece. Writing historical fiction set in the Greek Bronze Age?  Or simply enjoy reading this genre'?  Here's a study you may find interesting. C onventional estimates for the collapse of the Aegean civilization may be incorrect by up to a century, according to new radiocarbon analyses. While historical chronologies traditionally place the end of the Greek Bronze Age at around 1025 BCE, this latest research suggests a date 70 to 100 years earlier. www.weather-forecast.com Archaeologists from the University of Birmingham selected 60 samples of animal bones, plant remains and building timbers, excavated at Assiros in northern Greece, to be radiocarbon dated and correlated with 95.4% accuracy using Bayesian statistical methodology at the University of Oxford and the Akademie der Wissenschaften Heidelberg, Germany. Researcher Dr Ken Wardle says, 'These new results tell a story that is totall
Read more

Mood Instability and Your Characters

Image
You're putting together a character who's mood simply bounces all over the place, happy one moment, in a fit of rage the next.  Researchers at King's College London note that this sort of mood instability is part of a number of mental health disorders.  So how do you structure the personality and behavior of a character like this?  Below is the King's College report, along with a brief description from mentalhealth.com, of typical behavior, sometimes in the extreme, of a person who is very emotionally unstable.  This is offered strictly as a guide for crafting character in fiction - and NOT for the amateur diagnosis of the state of someone's mental health.  That is always best left to trained professionals. Another note about emotionally unstable behavior:  as any parent will tell you, this is how adolescents and teen-agers often behave.  It's a normal part of growing up - but it is a matter of degree .  In the extreme, however, this behavior can be diag
Read more

How the lives of Georgian gaolbirds and highwaymen shaped modern Britain

Image
Writing historical fiction requires solid research of available materials and databases.  The key word here is available.   So news of a new publicly accessible database that allows an author to research a very interesting past era is priceless almost beyond words.   I expect some exciting fiction to come out of this announcement. Here's the story, with a link to the source in the attribution. *  *  *  *  * London Lives, a landmark project led by Professor Bob Shoemaker from the University of Sheffield and Professor Tim Hitchcock from the University of Sussex, has uncovered a mass of extraordinary new evidence which reveals how the lives of thousands of 18th-century poor and criminal Londoners helped shape modern Britain. Based on evidence made available in a publicly available database, the study sheds new light on the everyday lives of thieves, prostitutes, vagrants, highwaymen, con-men, paupers and jailbirds, revealing how their daily fight for survival led to t
Read more

Remember faces but not names? You got it wrong.

Image
Source:   Daily Excelsior So, you think you're good at remembering faces, but terrible with names? New research has revealed we are actually better at remembering names than faces The cringe-worthy experience of not being able to remember an acquaintance's name leads many of us to believe we are terrible with names. However, new research has revealed this intuition is misleading; we are actually better at remembering names than faces. With the Christmas party season fast approaching, there will be plenty of opportunity to re-live the familiar, and excruciatingly-awkward, social situation of not being able to remember an acquaintance's name. This cringe-worthy experience leads many of us to believe we are terrible at remembering names. However, new research has revealed this intuition is misleading; we are actually better at remembering names than faces. The authors of the study, from the University of York, suggest that when we castigate ourselves f
Read more