Writers & Journalists Got It Wrong: Evangelicals Do Not See Conflict Between Religion & Science

The commonly held perception expounded by so many writers, authors and journalists is that evangelicals hold "science" as the enemy is wrong.  According to new research  presented by Rice University sociologist Elaine Howard Ecklund at the recent American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) conference, the majority, nearly seventy percent, see no conflict between science and their religious beliefs.

Just as some scientists hold strongly held religious beliefs, most evangelicals across a range of religions see science as another way of explaining how things work.  As some say, "science is about how, religion is about why - and perhaps who." 

So the truth is, the majority of population see no conflict, and as in politics, it's the noisy, extreme few who make the most furor about the supposed conflict.

Unfortunately, this simple truth doesn't sell newspapers, so it's unlikely this result will change how writers present their stories, whether fiction or nonfiction.  After all, as yellow-journalism creator József Pulitzer, publisher of the St. Louis Post Dispatch and the New York World knew, conflict and sensationalism sells.

Here's the story:
*  *  *  *  *

Nearly 70 percent of evangelical Christians do not view the two as being in conflict with each other.
Findings from the recently completed study "Religious Understandings of Science (RUS)" reveal that despite many misconceptions regarding the intersection of science and religion, nearly 70 percent of evangelical Christians do not view the two as being in conflict with each other.

Elaine Howard Ecklund, the principal investigator and researcher for the RUS project, is the Autrey Professor of Sociology and director of Rice's Religion and Public Life Program.

Ecklund noted that evangelicals are of interest in this study because they constitute approximately 26 percent of the population in the U.S. and are often considered the most hostile toward science.

"We really wanted to determine if this claim was based in any truth," Ecklund said. "Although many politicians and the media at large portray evangelicals as distrustful of science, we found that this is more myth than reality."

Other key findings:
  • Nearly half of evangelicals (48 percent) view science and religion as complementary to one another; 21 percent view them as entirely independent of one another.
  • Overall, 38 percent of Americans view religion and science as complementary, and 35 percent of Americans view science and religion as entirely independent.
  • In the U.S., 76 percent of scientists in the general population identify with a religious tradition.
  • Only 15 percent of Americans and 14 percent of evangelicals agree that modern science does more harm than good.
  • Jews (42 percent), Muslims, Buddhists and Hindus (52 percent as a group) and the nonreligious (47 percent) are more interested in new scientific discoveries than evangelicals (22 percent) are.
Science, Religion,
and the
Search for Meaning
Click on image to order
Ecklund plans to write a book about the survey findings with Chris Scheitle, a sociology professor at the West Virginia University. She hopes the research will shed light on how religious groups understand science and vice versa, in addition to providing outreach and translation to individuals who might have difficulties with some aspects of science.
RUS is the largest study of American views on religion and science. It includes a nationally representative survey of more than 10,000 Americans and more than 300 in-depth interviews with Christians, Jews and Muslims; more than 140 of the latter three groups are evangelical Christians. The study also included extensive observations of 23 religious centers in Houston and Chicago. The research is being provided to the AAAS Dialogue on Science Ethics and Religion program to help foster communication between religious groups and scientists.


Related stories:
  • Authors Use More Fear, Less Emotion Over Last 50 Years
  • Comprehending Comprehension
  • Conjunctions & Pronouns are the Language of Love
  • Darwinian themes of survival in romance novels, pop songs and movie plot lines
  • The Effect of Fictional Religions in Literature
  • The Growing Epidemic of "Valley Girl Speak"
  • How the Novels You Write May Actually Change the Biology of Your Reader's Brain
  • How to Get Them Lost in Your Narrative
  • How to Succeed as a Freelancer
  • How to Tell if the Magazine You Write for can Survive Digital Competition
  • Learning to be Funny: Comedy College
  • Literary Creativity Down; Artistic Creativity Up Since 1990
  • Reading Literary Fiction Improves 'Mind-Reading' Skills
  • Salinger ~ A New Biography
  • Seven commonly held myths about your brain
  • The very real risks to women of 50 Shades of Grey
  • To Cut Teen Smoking, Rate Films with Smoking R
  • Your Brain Spots Grammar Error You Might Miss

    • * *  *  *  * 
    Story Source:  Materials provided by Rice University. "Nearly 70 percent of evangelicals do not view religion, science as being in conflict." ScienceDaily, 13 March 2015

    Comments

    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    How the lives of Georgian gaolbirds and highwaymen shaped modern Britain

    Image
    Writing historical fiction requires solid research of available materials and databases.  The key word here is available.   So news of a new publicly accessible database that allows an author to research a very interesting past era is priceless almost beyond words.   I expect some exciting fiction to come out of this announcement. Here's the story, with a link to the source in the attribution. *  *  *  *  * London Lives, a landmark project led by Professor Bob Shoemaker from the University of Sheffield and Professor Tim Hitchcock from the University of Sussex, has uncovered a mass of extraordinary new evidence which reveals how the lives of thousands of 18th-century poor and criminal Londoners helped shape modern Britain. Based on evidence made available in a publicly available database, the study sheds new light on the everyday lives of thieves, prostitutes, vagrants, highwaymen, con-men, paupers and jailbirds, revealing how their daily fight for survival led to t
    Read more

    An unexpected way to recover from a breakup

    Image
    Breaking up is truly hard to do. And recovery from a breakup can be even harder. Your friends may counsel you to put the whole thing out of your mind. But new research suggests that repeatedly reflecting on a break-up -- even through participation in a research study -- actually speeds emotional recovery. "Breakups are ubiquitous -- most adults have experienced at least one in their life -- and are typically very distressing," says Grace Larson of Northwestern University. After studying divorce and breakups for years using longitudinal, multi-method designs, Larson and her then-adviser David Sbarra of the University of Arizona wanted to study whether these research techniques on their own were affecting participants. One concern they had was that the studies could be harming participants, Larson says. "At first glance, it might seem like repeatedly reminding participants that they had just broken up -- and asking them to describe the breakup over and over --
    Read more

    Greek Bronze Age ended 100 years earlier than thought

    Image
    Source: www.shef.ac.uk The charred remains of Assiros Toumba in Greece. Writing historical fiction set in the Greek Bronze Age?  Or simply enjoy reading this genre'?  Here's a study you may find interesting. C onventional estimates for the collapse of the Aegean civilization may be incorrect by up to a century, according to new radiocarbon analyses. While historical chronologies traditionally place the end of the Greek Bronze Age at around 1025 BCE, this latest research suggests a date 70 to 100 years earlier. www.weather-forecast.com Archaeologists from the University of Birmingham selected 60 samples of animal bones, plant remains and building timbers, excavated at Assiros in northern Greece, to be radiocarbon dated and correlated with 95.4% accuracy using Bayesian statistical methodology at the University of Oxford and the Akademie der Wissenschaften Heidelberg, Germany. Researcher Dr Ken Wardle says, 'These new results tell a story that is totall
    Read more

    Mood Instability and Your Characters

    Image
    You're putting together a character who's mood simply bounces all over the place, happy one moment, in a fit of rage the next.  Researchers at King's College London note that this sort of mood instability is part of a number of mental health disorders.  So how do you structure the personality and behavior of a character like this?  Below is the King's College report, along with a brief description from mentalhealth.com, of typical behavior, sometimes in the extreme, of a person who is very emotionally unstable.  This is offered strictly as a guide for crafting character in fiction - and NOT for the amateur diagnosis of the state of someone's mental health.  That is always best left to trained professionals. Another note about emotionally unstable behavior:  as any parent will tell you, this is how adolescents and teen-agers often behave.  It's a normal part of growing up - but it is a matter of degree .  In the extreme, however, this behavior can be diag
    Read more

    Remember faces but not names? You got it wrong.

    Image
    Source:   Daily Excelsior So, you think you're good at remembering faces, but terrible with names? New research has revealed we are actually better at remembering names than faces The cringe-worthy experience of not being able to remember an acquaintance's name leads many of us to believe we are terrible with names. However, new research has revealed this intuition is misleading; we are actually better at remembering names than faces. With the Christmas party season fast approaching, there will be plenty of opportunity to re-live the familiar, and excruciatingly-awkward, social situation of not being able to remember an acquaintance's name. This cringe-worthy experience leads many of us to believe we are terrible at remembering names. However, new research has revealed this intuition is misleading; we are actually better at remembering names than faces. The authors of the study, from the University of York, suggest that when we castigate ourselves f
    Read more