How your brain works to make you indecisive
Credit: UZHPreference-based decisions were less stable if the information
flow between the two brain regions was disrupted.
Don't know about you, but I find all of the current research on how our brains function fascinating. From a layman's point of view (mine), our brains are a highly complex organ consisting of 8 billion neurons organized into twenty modes, or functional regions. Most of what constitutes our thoughts are generated almost randomly by the various modes and transmitted to our conscious minds which acts like traffic control at O'Hare Airport during a snow storm over the holidays.
Each mode is calling for attention of the conscious mind. You know how random thoughts go flittering through your mind while you're trying to sleep? That's the result of various modes getting the attention of traffic control, if only for a moment.
One thing that research shows is that a person can only think about one thing at a time, the reason it's so very dangerous text or talk on a cell phone while driving. The act of following a conversation activates that mode, essentially turning off the mode that pays attention to the task of driving. It's not a matter of multi-tasking. Turn on one mode, say creativity, and your conscious mind ignores signals from the other 19 modes.
So this study by researchers at the University of Zurich studied indecisiveness, or how your conscious mind filters and chooses options from the cacophony of input from the various regions of your brain.
You'll find a link to the full study in the attribution line.
* * * * *
Brain waves behind indecisiveness discovered
Some people find it difficult to make decisions.
It's the old story: You're in a restaurant and can't make up your mind what to order.
|How Our Brain Works: |
The Construction and
Presented and Explained
by Donald A. Millers
Order new or used from
The more intensive the information flow, the more decisive.
How come some people are so uncertain of their preferences and keep making new choices while others know exactly what they like and want?
A team headed by Professor Christian Ruff, a neuroeconomist from the University of Zurich, set about investigating this question. The Zurich researchers discovered that the precision and stability of preference decisions do not only depend on the strength of the activation of one or more brain regions. Instead, the key for stable preference choices is the intensity of the communication between two areas of the brain which represent our preferences or are involved in spatial orientation and action planning.
The researchers used transcranial alternating current stimulation, a non-invasive brain stimulation method that enables generation of coordinated oscillations in the activity of particular brain regions. The test subjects did not realize that they were being stimulated. Using this technique, the researchers intensified or reduced the information flow between the prefrontal cortex located directly below the forehead and the parietal cortex just above both ears. The test subjects had to make preference-based or purely sensory decisions about food.
"We discovered that preference-based decisions were less stable if the information flow between the two brain regions was disrupted. Our test subjects were therefore more indecisive. For the purely sensory decisions, however, there was no such effect," explains Ruff. "Consequently, the communication between the two brain regions is only relevant if we have to decide whether we like something and not when we make decisions based on objective facts." There was no evidence of any gender-specific effects in the experiments.
It was not possible to make the decisions more stable by intensifying the information flow. However, the study participants were young, healthy test subjects with highly developed decision-making skills. On the other hand, the results of the study could be used for therapeutic measures in the future -- such as in patients who suffer from a high degree of impulsiveness and indecisiveness in the aftermath of brain disorders.
- A Blood Test for Psychosis? It's here.
- Are We Hard-wired for Chocolate and Hybrid Cars?
- Are We Hard-wired to Believe in Immortality? Science Suggests, Yes
- Are we hard-wired to take risks?
- Brains Process the Pain of Villains More Than the Pain of People We Like
- Brain structure predicts risky behavior
- Conservative vs. Liberal: Are we born that way?
- Controlling Robotic Arm by Thought Alone
- Does reading fiction make readers more empathetic?
- fMRI Brain scans: Far better than the polygraph
- Hallucinations and Delusions More Common than Thought
- How the brain listens to literature
- How Poverty Molds the Brain
- How the Novels You Write May Actually Change the Biology of Your Reader's Brain
- How Will You Use the New Road Map for Brain-computer Interface?
- Scientist Develops Method to Read Minds
- SciFi in Real Life: Steerable Needles in Your Brain
- Selectively Rewiring Brain Circuitry to Treat Depression
- Seven commonly held myths about your brain
- The Small But Important Difference Between Apes and Humans
- Tiny molecular change linked to psychiatric illness
- Why some people hear color, taste sounds
- Your Brain Activity Can Predict if You Might Commit a Crime.
- Your Childhood Personality Predicts Who You Will be as an Adult
Story Source: Materials provided by University of Zurich. Rafael Polanía, Marius Moisa, Alexander Opitz, Marcus Grueschow, Christian C. Ruff. The precision of value-based choices depends causally on fronto-parietal phase coupling. Nature Communications, 2015