How your brain works to make you indecisive

Credit: UZH
Preference-based decisions were less stable if the information
flow between the two brain regions was disrupted.
Don't know about you, but I find all of the current research on how our brains function fascinating. From a layman's point of view (mine), our brains are a highly complex organ consisting of 8 billion neurons organized into twenty modes, or functional regions.  Most of what constitutes our thoughts are generated almost randomly by the various modes and transmitted to our conscious minds which acts like traffic control at O'Hare Airport during a snow storm over the holidays.

Each mode is calling for attention of the conscious mind.  You know how random thoughts go flittering through your mind while you're trying to sleep?  That's the result of various modes getting the attention of traffic control, if only for a moment. 

One thing that research shows is that a person can only think about one thing at a time, the reason it's so very dangerous text or talk on a cell phone while driving.  The act of following a conversation activates that mode, essentially turning off the mode that pays attention to the task of driving.  It's not a matter of multi-tasking.  Turn on one mode, say creativity, and your conscious mind ignores signals from the other 19 modes.

So this study by researchers at the University of Zurich studied indecisiveness, or how your conscious mind filters and chooses options from the cacophony of input from the various regions of your brain.

You'll find a link to the full study in the attribution line.
*  *  *  *  * 

Brain waves behind indecisiveness discovered

Some people find it difficult to make decisions.

It's the old story: You're in a restaurant and can't make up your mind what to order.

How Our Brain Works:
The Construction and
Functionality of
Your Brain
Presented and Explained

by Donald A. Millers

Order new or used from
Powell's Books
After studying the menu for some time and many discussions, you eventually choose the steak. But you can't relax during the meal and keep wondering whether you should have gone for the veal after all. Such difficulties with decisions crop up in all aspects of life, not only food. However, they predominantly affect preference-based decisions, i.e. questions like "what do I prefer -- melon or cherries?" Purely sensory decisions based on sensorial information such as "what is bigger -- melon or cherry?" are less prone to indecisiveness.

The more intensive the information flow, the more decisive.

How come some people are so uncertain of their preferences and keep making new choices while others know exactly what they like and want?

A team headed by Professor Christian Ruff, a neuroeconomist from the University of Zurich, set about investigating this question. The Zurich researchers discovered that the precision and stability of preference decisions do not only depend on the strength of the activation of one or more brain regions. Instead, the key for stable preference choices is the intensity of the communication between two areas of the brain which represent our preferences or are involved in spatial orientation and action planning.

The researchers used transcranial alternating current stimulation, a non-invasive brain stimulation method that enables generation of coordinated oscillations in the activity of particular brain regions. The test subjects did not realize that they were being stimulated. Using this technique, the researchers intensified or reduced the information flow between the prefrontal cortex located directly below the forehead and the parietal cortex just above both ears. The test subjects had to make preference-based or purely sensory decisions about food.

"We discovered that preference-based decisions were less stable if the information flow between the two brain regions was disrupted. Our test subjects were therefore more indecisive. For the purely sensory decisions, however, there was no such effect," explains Ruff. "Consequently, the communication between the two brain regions is only relevant if we have to decide whether we like something and not when we make decisions based on objective facts." There was no evidence of any gender-specific effects in the experiments.

It was not possible to make the decisions more stable by intensifying the information flow. However, the study participants were young, healthy test subjects with highly developed decision-making skills. On the other hand, the results of the study could be used for therapeutic measures in the future -- such as in patients who suffer from a high degree of impulsiveness and indecisiveness in the aftermath of brain disorders.

Related stories:

Story Source:  Materials provided by University of Zurich.  Rafael PolanĂ­a, Marius Moisa, Alexander Opitz, Marcus Grueschow, Christian C. Ruff. The precision of value-based choices depends causally on fronto-parietal phase coupling. Nature Communications, 2015


Popular posts from this blog

Many Hurricane Harvey Deaths in Houston Occurred Outside a Flood Zone

Your visual cortex makes decisions?

Einstein's "Spooky Action at a Distance" Proven

Coffee helps teams work together

Possible early Viking settlement in North America explored