Restraint, Confinement Still an Everyday Mental Health Practice
www.patientcareproduct.com
|
So you're working on a story in which a character, perhaps even your protagonist, ends up in a mental hospital or clinic. The question is, do these facilities still use straightjackets and other physical restraints? Do they still put people into "padded rooms"? Do they use medications to control out-of-control patients like your character?
Your character may only be in there to keep them out of the way. They may or may not have any type of disorder that requires hospitalization. In fact, they may even be normal, whatever that is.
Well, the answer is yes, these restraining techniques still exist and are used, despite the possibility of harm to the patient - or in this case, your character.
Here's the report - restrain away!
Restraint, confinement still an everyday
practice in mental health settings
Providers of mental-health services still rely on intervention techniques such as physical restraint and confinement to control some psychiatric hospital patients, a practice that can cause harm to both patients and care facilities, according to a new study.
Providers of mental-health services still rely on intervention techniques such as physical restraint and confinement to control some psychiatric hospital patients, a practice which can cause harm to both patients and care facilities, according to a new study from the University of Waterloo.
The study, which appears in a special mental health issue of Healthcare Management Forum, found that almost one in four psychiatric patients in Ontario hospitals are restrained using control interventions, such as chairs that prevent rising, wrist restraints, seclusion rooms or acute control medications.
Roadmap to Seclusion and Restraint Free Mental Health Services Order new and used from Powell's Books |
The research reveals that Ontario health-care providers administer acute control medication to almost 20 per cent of psychiatric patients in order to manage dangerous situations.
"Control interventions are not ideal because they counter a patient-centered approach to care and can damage therapeutic relationships while further stigmatizing patients," said Tina Mah, lead author and vice president of planning, performance management and research at Grand River Hospital. "There are also organizational implications of control interventions use including increased costs of care, reputational harm and exposure to potential litigation."
The study suggests that earlier detection of illness or deterioration would help avoid patient crisis and minimize the use of physical restraint, sedation or seclusion. In addition, health-care providers should not use control interventions when a psychiatric emergency is not present.
"Health-care leaders need to pursue more patient-centred approaches to the provision of mental health services. The Mental Health and Addictions Quality Initiative is a positive example of collaboration by hospitals to improve the quality of mental-health services, including in the area of control intervention use" said Mah.
The special issue of Healthcare Management Forum also reports that delays in transferring mental health patients out of hospitals and into other care settings costs the government an average of $7,650 per patient. Francophone Ontarians are one third as likely to have daily contact with psychiatrists compared to English-speaking patients after controlling for a variety of other explanatory factors.
"While reducing expenditures is a priority in the current health-care climate, leaders need to be aware of the importance of making mental-health services equally accessible for all Canadians and protecting our most vulnerable citizens," said Professor Hirdes.
In 2005, the government mandated that all Ontario hospitals complete the interRAI's mental health assessment for all adult patients in psychiatric hospitals or units. The assessment tool helps mental-health professionals obtain a comprehensive overview of factors related to mental health in order to support the development of better care plans to respond to the person's strengths, preferences and needs.
Related posts:
- Aggressive Sports and Domestic Violence
- Are Dogs 'Kids?'
- Brains Process the Pain of Villains More Than the Pain of People We Like
- Change, Conflict Cue Memories of Life's Milestones
- Do Patients in a Vegetative State Recognize Loved Ones?
- Expansive postures = state of power = sign of dishonest behavior
- If You're Not Looking for It, You Probably Won't See It
- Intelligence Is Not a Remedy for Racism
- It's Better to Be Confident Than Correct
- Kill One or Kill Five? How People Respond to Moral Dilemmas
- Nearly 7 in 10 Americans Are On Prescription Drugs
- Nightmares Create Feelings of Sadness, Confusion, Guilt, and Disgust ~ Not Fear
- People Remember Unattractive Faces More Than Attractive Ones
- The Small But Important Difference Between Apes and Humans
- Sudden Wealth makes People Conservative and Less Egalitarian
- Touch May Alleviate Fear for People with Low Self-Esteem
- Weighed Down by Guilt: Research Shows It's More Than a Metaphor
- Yes, People Can Learn Compassion
- Your "Sherlock Holmes" Character: What Pupil Size Says About People Facing a Decision
Comments
Post a Comment