Developing Characters Who Believe in Pure Evil

For authors and screenwriters, this study out of Kansas State University explains a subtle difference between "good guys", say a cop or a prosecutor, who supports the death penalty above all and a person in a similar role who does not, and why they take such different views.
 
As Donald Saucier, associate professor of psychological sciences at KSU, discovered in his research, it's the character's belief in pure evil.  If the character believes in pure evil, that character will be more likely to insist on long prison sentences or the death penalty.  And when a bad guy character they view as being purely evil receives a less-than-the maximum sentence, they are going to be very upset. I can see such a character going to extremes to make sure that the purely evil character gets what's coming to him - in their eyes.  Perhaps even breaking the law themselves to accomplish it.
 
On the other hand, there are characters in a similar law enforcement role who doesn't believe in pure evil who perhaps comes into conflict with a character who does.  So another story line here: the second character trying to stop the first from framing a purely evil character, or suppressing evidence that mitigates or exonerates. 
 
My guess is that many in law enforcement and prosecution have a belief in pure evil which may explain why there are so many cases of suppressed or falsified evidence.
 
There are surely more story lines and characters that this research can help you develop.
 
Here's the story:
*  *  *  *  *
 
Demons are everywhere:
The effects of belief in pure evil,
demonization, and retribution on
punishing criminal perpetrators
 
Our belief in pure evil influences our feelings about capital punishment, finds a Kansas State University psychology study.

Donald Saucier, associate professor of psychological sciences and 2015-2016 Coffman chair for distinguished teaching scholars, looked at how beliefs in pure evil influenced how people treated those who committed crimes. He recently completed the study with Russell Webster at St. Mary's College of Maryland.

Approximately 200 participants were given a summary of a case in which a murderer confessed to his crime. Researchers then asked each participant about his or her support for different types of sentences, such as jail time with community service, jail time with the opportunity for parole, jail time without the possibility for parole and other options.

"We found that as people's beliefs in pure evil increased, they were more likely to support sentences like life in prison without parole and even the death penalty," Saucier said. "We found that this actually happened through our participants perceiving the murderer as a demon and feeling that there was some need for retribution for the murder committed."

Researchers then changed the murderer's characteristics to be consistent with stereotypes about evil. These included having the murderer be interested in the occult, taunting neighborhood children and wearing all black. The characteristics also were changed so the murderer was less stereotypically evil. This included having the murderer be relatively quiet, having a family and being interested in camping.

Developing Characters:
A Teach Yourself
Masterclass
in Creative Writing
by Irving Weinman

Click on image
for information
"People who saw the stereotypically evil person versus the non-stereotypically evil person recommended greater sentences," Saucier said. "But, if they believed in pure evil, it didn't matter the characteristics; they were more likely to support the death penalty or life in prison. The belief in pure evil overrode our stereotypically evil person."

This belief helps explain how opinions of others are formed during social interactions and how believing whether a person is "good" or "bad" at his or her core shapes those interactions.

Moreover, it may help explain how a court jury or judge is likely to assign punishment for a crime. While a belief in pure evil probably would not prompt a guilty verdict, it may influence the jury's sentence, Saucier said. For example, sentencing in the trials of Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and Colorado movie theater shooter James Holmes could be influenced by jury members' belief in pure evil.

Saucier said it's likely that life experience more than religion that influences a belief in pure evil. When investigating whether a religious upbringing was linked to a belief in pure evil, researchers found that people's belief in pure evil didn't necessitate a belief in pure good and vice versa.

"This belief may change based on traumas, victimization and the celebrations of human success in our life," Saucier said. "We think it's a dynamic variable and influences our social interaction and social perceptions."

Synopsis
  • People who believe in pure evil are more likely support sentences such as life in prison without parole and the death penalty for criminals.
  • It's likely that life experience more than religion that influences a belief in pure evil.
  • When investigating whether a religious upbringing was linked to a belief in pure evil, researchers found that people's belief in pure evil didn't necessitate a belief in pure good and vice versa.
Related stories:

Story Source:  Materials provided by Kansas State University, original article was written by Greg Tammen.  Russell J. Webster, Donald A. Saucier. Demons are everywhere: The effects of belief in pure evil, demonization, and retribution on punishing criminal perpetrators. Personality and Individual Differences, 2015

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Perfectionism a Major Factor in Suicide

The 2014 Ig Nobel Prizes: The friction of banana skins, Jesus on toast, Baby poop in sausages and more

Here, kitty, kitty, kitty. Humans met sabre-tooth cats 300,000 years ago